The High Court of Justice on Tuesday night canceled a hearing scheduled for Thursday on petitions urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to dismiss National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir (Otzma Yehudit), ruling that there was “no practical point” in holding the session absent a substantive response from the prime minister on the petitions’ factual claims. 

In a decision signed by Supreme Court President Justice Isaac Amit, Deputy President Justice Noam Solberg, and Justice Daphne Barak-Erez, the court said it had reviewed the parties’ filings and noted that the government’s preliminary response leaned primarily on a broad “principled position.”

The position was “not necessarily influenced by” the specific alleged events involving Ben-Gvir - while largely avoiding a detailed engagement with the factual record presented by other parties.

Because the administrative decision at the center of the petitions is Netanyahu’s own decision - and because the court said it did not have before it a meaningful, fact-specific position from him - the justices determined that proceeding as planned would not be useful. 

At the same time, the court ordered that the petitions be transferred to an expanded five-justice panel, citing the “weight” of the issues raised and relying on the statutory mechanism allowing expansion of the bench.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a 40 signatures debate, at the plenum hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on January 5, 2026.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a 40 signatures debate, at the plenum hall of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on January 5, 2026. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

The court stated that the expanded panel would consider, at the start of February, whether to issue a conditional order - a step that would require the respondents to formally justify why the relief sought by petitioners should not be granted - and would also rule on pending motions to join the proceedings.

A new hearing date is to be set no later than the end of March 2026, the decision said.

Netanyahu pressed for a fact-specific response on Ben-Gvir

The court further said it would not, on its own initiative, add the Knesset as a respondent, emphasizing that the challenged administrative decision is Netanyahu’s, while leaving open the possibility that the Knesset could ask to be added if it believes it is a relevant party. 

The consolidated set of petitions lists Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, and the attorney general among the respondents, alongside requests by additional parties to join - including the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) and other entities and individuals.