Related:
Ex-fraud cop: State’s witness likely has Holyland tapes
Mahane Yehuda regulars bemoan city government’s tarnished imageOn April 13, Judge Avraham Heiman ordered Charni and Kelner, together with three other suspects, to be remanded in custody until April 21.Police said Charni was a “central suspect” in the case.“He gave the bribes and reaped the benefits,” police prosecutor Lior Rice told Heiman.Kelner, the police charged, “was an office- and shareholder in the senior company of Holyland Park, which purchased the land in 2000, as well as in the Zera Company and others. He is suspected of paying bribes amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars to advance these projects.”The lower court accepted the state’s argument that Charni, Kelner and the three other suspects – who have since been released to house arrest – would try to obstruct justice if allowed to go home.Four of the suspects appealed the lower court decision to the Central District Court. However, Judge Avraham Tal rejected the appeals. In the meantime, one of the suspects was released from jail. The three others appealed Tal’s ruling to the Supreme Court. During Sunday’s hearing, one of the suspects, Eliyahu Sasson, an accountant for Holyland Park, dropped out of the appeal after reaching an agreement that he would be released from custody later in the day.That left Charni and Kelner. Charni’s lawyers, Oren and Gideon Aderet, denied that their client might try to obstruct the investigation if released to house arrest. They told the court that Charni had known a long time ago that he would eventually be investigated and was aware of at least some of the allegations currently aimed at him. Nevertheless, he had not tried to cover his tracks. They also stressed that Charni had already been in jail for eight days before his remand was extended.Attorney Eitan Maoz, pleading on behalf of Kelner, said it was unusual to hold a suspect in custody on suspicion of an economic crime for more than three or four days. Kelner, who had already been held for six days, was now going to be held in jail for nine more days, according to the police request.“How can it be,” asked Maoz, “that during the six days the suspect wasin detention, concern that he might obstruct the investigation has onlyincreased? If keeping him in jail does not help allay fears that hewill disrupt the proceedings, what is the point detaining him?”Ben-AriSchwiki argued that the fact that five of the suspects had beenreleased to house arrest was proof that the police had examined thecase of each one individually and had come to the conclusion thatCharni and Kelner must remain in custody “for at least a few moredays.”Fogelman rejected both appeals and upheld the decision to remand them in custody until April 21.