"Many of the Christian community are deeply unhappy about the allegations being leveled by our government on Israel," explained Philip Rosenthal, director of ChristianView Network.
In past cases the ICJ has sometimes granted additional emergency measures when circumstances on the ground changed.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was present at the match, giving a speech calling to "Free Palestine."
It is important to note that what we see is not based on October 7 but the development of a new antisemitic ideological claim of Israel being the new apartheid.
The ANC government explicitly takes sides with Hamas in this conflict and is now waging lawfare against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague.
In soccer terminology, Israel received a yellow card but was spared, for now at least, a red card, having been unable to get the ICJ to throw out South Africa's case against it.
The South African charge is outrageous, meritless, scandalous, without foundation, a blood libel… to cite only a few of the adjectives used. Here is why it should have been rejected by the court.
This article will attempt to explain the historic and policy considerations that led to South Africa’s submission of a document that it did not have the resources to create.
“For Jews, this country no longer feels like a safe space or ‘home,’” writes Howard Sackstein of the SA Jewish Report after South Africa's anti-Israel activity during the Hamas war.
The new judge has previously claimed that critics of Israel are labeled antisemites "to intimidate and discredit them."
JPOST Digital Library
