High court rejects appeal submitted against SSTO head Erez

By JPOST.COM STAFF
June 11, 2009 14:51

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The High Court of Justice sharply criticized the conduct of Secondary School Teachers Organization (SSTO) head Ran Erez on Thursday following a probe which revealed that he was paid for classes in an Ashdod school at which he never taught. However, the court rejected an appeal submitted against Erez by SSTO member Shlomo Cohen, saying there was no need for judicial intervention after disciplinary measures were taken by the SSTO. The court said it was never proven that Erez acted deliberately in order to continue receiving the payments. The probe further found that Erez asked the school every year to schedule classes for him to teach but never showed up. He was also defined as a coordinator of the gym classes and this was reflected in his pay, even though this, too, was a position he never actively filled. The court found Erez's conduct to be "a wrong and prolonged tactic exploited by a state employee who gets paid without fulfilling his duties. This behavior reflects bad conduct for any state employee," but in Erez's case is even worse, "because he heads a large organization and is expected to be an example to its members."

Related Content

Breaking news
August 17, 2018
U.S. says redirects Syria funds as allies pony up $300 million

By REUTERS