Histadrut court delays decision on Peretz, Cabel

March 7, 2012 15:13
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Labor MKs Amir Peretz and Eitan Cabel will have to wait until next week to find out whether they will be permitted to challenge Ofer Eini for the chairmanship of the Histadrut Labor Federation.

In a session in Tel Aviv described by Peretz as stormy, an internal Histadrut court of three judges decided to cancel Wednesday's hearing that was expected to decide whether Cabel and Peretz could run, because the Histadrut's elections committee did not have the authority to summon the MKs to the hearing.The court ruled that the elections committee must meet with Peretz and Cabel within three days to hear their defense against the committee's charges that they forged the signatures of hundreds of Histadrut members on forms enabling them to run.

Within three days after that, the committee must decide whether they will be permitted to run in the May 22 election. If the committee decides to bar either of them from running, they can return to the court.

Peretz called the decision a victory for him and Cabel, because the court criticized the elections committee. The court questioned why the elections committee dismissed signatures as forgeries based on phone calls checking their authenticity instead of visiting the workers and asking them personally whether they had signed.

Read full article here

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Breaking news
March 22, 2019
Two U.S. service members killed in Afghanistan - statement