AG to Supreme Court: Expulsion of cadets was justified

Officer's course trainees were dismissed when they walked out of ceremony because female soldiers were singing.

By
September 21, 2011 07:16
1 minute read.
A haredi man walks past IDF soldiers

soldiers haredi 311. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Office submitted its response Tuesday night to the lawsuit filed by Yoel Glickman, one of four religious cadets in the army’s officers’ course who were expelled from the program for refusing to return to an army event involving women singing.

The Attorney General’s submission stated that the expulsion of the cadets was justified and their refusal to listen to their commander who instructed them to go back to the event constituted a violation of a legitimate order.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


“This petition deals with a basic principle of the IDF: The principle of accepting the army’s authority and the obligation to comply, which means among other things, recognizing the subjugation of soldiers to the authority of the army and the authority of army commanders,” the Attorney General’s response read.

“Naturally, the IDF cannot accept a situation in which soldiers do not, in a clear and definitive manner, see themselves as subject to the army’s authority.”

The submission stated that the order for the soldiers to return to the event was not an illegal command, which may be refused, and it was therefore incumbent upon the soldiers to comply with their commander’s order.

Despite the stance taken by the Attorney General’s Office, its response nevertheless stated that Glickman would be able to start a new officer’s course when it starts in six weeks.

Related Content

idf hebron
August 22, 2014
Palestinians throw Molotov cocktail at IDF checkpoint in Hebron

By KHALED ABU TOAMEH, TOVAH LAZAROFF