SF anti-circumcision measure ‘unconstitutional’

The Jewish and Muslims groups that filed the lawsuit argue that state law prevents local governments from restricting medical procedures.

July 5, 2011 06:22
1 minute read.
An Israeli teaches a doctor in Swaziland to prefor

circumcision swaziland 311. (photo credit: Jerusalem AIDS Project)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The San Francisco City Attorney’s Office has criticized as unconstitutional a proposed ballot measure calling for a ban on male circumcision in the city, because it includes an exemption for cases of medical necessity but not religion.

“San Franciscans cannot be asked to vote on whether to prohibit religious minorities from engaging in a particular religious practice, when the same practice may be performed under nonreligious auspices,” the city attorney said in a brief filed to the Superior Court on Thursday in response to a suit filed by a coalition of Jewish and Muslim groups against those proposing the ban.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Anti-circumcision call gets London Jewish rep. fired
US congressman writes bill to protect circumcision
San Francisco to put circumcision ban on the ballot

“If the court concludes that the measure is preempted as applied to medical professionals, then the remaining application is unconstitutional and the court should remove the measure from the ballot entirely,” the brief continued.

The Jewish and Muslims groups that filed the lawsuit argue that state law prevents local governments from restricting medical procedures, including, they say, circumcision.

In the brief, Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart referred to the Foreskin Man comic book released by campaigners for the ballot proposal, which depicts a superhero battling to stop stereotypical Jewish figures carrying out circumcisions.

“Especially in light of disturbing campaign materials that evoke the ugliest kind of anti- Semitic propaganda, the city has an obligation to petition the court to remove the measure from the ballot in its entirety if it is preempted as applied to medical professionals,” Stewart said.

These materials, the brief said, “portray the battle against circumcision as one between good, represented by a blonde, blue-eyed superhero and his fair-skinned female friend, and evil, represented by four darkhaired, dark-skinned menacing Jewish characters with prominent noses, sinister expressions and sadistic tendencies.”


The case will be heard on July 15.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Chelsea Football
October 19, 2018
Chelsea blows the whistle on antisemitism