Israel's finance minister threatened businesses against joining protests - report

The allegations have ignited a heated debate about the integrity of the country's business and political landscape.

 Head of the Religious Zionist Party MK Bezalel Smotrich  gives a press statement at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on May 26, 2021.  (photo credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)
Head of the Religious Zionist Party MK Bezalel Smotrich gives a press statement at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on May 26, 2021.
(photo credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

Harel Wiesel, owner of the store Israeli clothing and home goods store FOX, revealed on Sunday evening that he had been threatened by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich not to join the protest against judicial reform, according to a report by KAN. 

Wiesel made this claim during an evening business forum held in Tel Aviv, stating that Arnon Bar-David, chairman of the Histadrut, had relayed the threat to him. The allegations have ignited a heated debate about the integrity of the country's business and political landscape.

According to Wiesel, during his ongoing communication with Bar-David, the Histadrut chairman expressed concerns about the implications of joining the protest.

Allegedly, Bar-David cited an agreement with Smotrich regarding 600,000 employees and mentioned receiving threats that any dissenting remarks would lead to the agreement's dissolution.

 Arnon Ben Dor, Chairman of the Histadrut, speaks at a press conference attended by heads from the Israeli commerce sector attend a press conference at the Histadrut Union in Tel Aviv on March 27, 2023.  (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/MAARIV)
Arnon Ben Dor, Chairman of the Histadrut, speaks at a press conference attended by heads from the Israeli commerce sector attend a press conference at the Histadrut Union in Tel Aviv on March 27, 2023. (credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/MAARIV)

Potential interference in free expression

These claims, if true, highlight potential government interference in free expression and raise questions about the power dynamics at play.

Bar-David swiftly denied the allegations, stating that he has not engaged in any conversations with Wiesel since March.

He firmly asserted that he has not been subjected to any form of threats or extortion. Emphasizing his dedication to the well-being of workers in Israel, Bar-David dismissed the leaked information as a collection of baseless rumors. He stressed the need for responsible actions to navigate the sensitive period the nation is currently experiencing.

The Histadrut's internal and external challenges

The news of the alleged threats and extortion attempts comes as the Histadrut, Israel's largest trade union organization, grapples with internal and external challenges.

The organization plays a vital role in representing the interests of workers and negotiating employment agreements.

As the country faces contentious debates over judicial reform and the narrowing of reasonable cause, tensions have been running high within the Histadrut and the wider business community.

During the evening business forum attended by influential figures such as Dana Azrieli, Liora Ofer, Marcus Nacht and Eitan Bar-Ze'ev, concerns were raised about the potential impact of the widespread judicial reform protests on the Israeli economy.

Participants debated the appropriate response to crossing what they deemed a "red line" in terms of legislation and its effects on reasonable cause.

While differing opinions emerged, with some advocating for negotiations and others expressing reluctance to shut down the economy at present, there was unity among business leaders to address the challenges.

Bar-David and the Treasury are expected to sign the second phase of a wage agreement on Monday, which is anticipated to release additional funds.

"After the suspension of legislation, the forum calls on the heads of all parties in the Knesset - both the coalition and the opposition - to immediately return to negotiations," the forum stated. "As long as the leaders from all political sides do not act as required by the urgency of the situation before it becomes irreversible, the forum will take decisive action through the legal means as its disposal to return the politicians to the negotiating table."