"Why do Israelis so often criticize the UN?” is a question I hear a lot.

The answer can be found by reversing the words: The UN bashes Israel literally as a matter of routine. It is mandated to discuss Israel’s perceived faults and wrongdoings every three months in the Security Council, three times a year in the Human Rights Council, and finishes every year with a round of condemnations in the General Assembly.

In short, Israel is never far from the UN spotlight as the “bad guys,” while an entire department is dedicated to promoting the Palestinian narrative.

Indeed, on February 3, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres addressed the 2026 opening session of the “Committee for The Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.” After listing grievances against Israel, he declared: “In Gaza, Palestinians continue to endure grave suffering,” as if Israelis don’t suffer from war and terrorism.

Guterres spouted his usual mantras: “The work of this committee reminds the world that we must never lose sight of the core objective: resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The occupation must end, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice. The inalienable rights of the Palestinian people must be realized. International law must be respected, and accountability ensured. The unity, contiguity, and integrity of the Occupied Palestinian Territory must be preserved.”

The path to “a just, lasting peace between Palestinians and Israelis,” according to Guterres, lies solely in the “two-state solution… A solution with Israel and a fully independent, democratic, contiguous, viable, and sovereign Palestinian state, of which Gaza is an integral part – living side by side in peace and security within secure and recognized borders, on the basis of the pre-1967 lines, with Jerusalem as the capital of both states.”

The fact that the Palestinians in Gaza and Judea and Samaria (“Occupied Palestinian Territory,” in UN terminology) don’t have peace even among themselves – and are not demanding to live in security alongside Israel, but to destroy it – did not faze him.

The size of Central Park

And if you think the Old City of Jerusalem, which is about the size of New York’s Central Park, could be peacefully split into the shared capital of two states that have different religions, speak different languages, and work according to different calendars, you might want to check what you’re smoking in your pipe dream.

Had the Palestinians and the Arab world wanted to live in peace with the Jewish state, they wouldn’t have attacked Israel in 1948 and 1967. Losing the wars they launched in the hope of eliminating the Jewish state is what led to these lines and “the Occupation” in the first place.

Pro-Palestinians complain of the extent of Israeli destruction in Gaza but ignore the October 7, 2023, invasion and mega-atrocity that triggered it. Israel is faulted for responding to the attack in which 1,200 were slaughtered, 251 abducted, and thousands wounded. Had there not been rocket barrages from Gaza and a warren of terror tunnels the size of the London Underground, Israeli forces would not have destroyed the homes, hospitals, mosques, and schools that provided them with cover. Thousands of lives – Gazan and Israeli – could have been saved.

I have written all this before and will no doubt write it again: I am one of those Israelis who sees the UN and its various departments such as UNRWA, dedicated solely to Palestinian needs, as part of the problem, not the solution.

But it wasn’t Guterres’s words on the Palestinian issue that caused me last week to wonder out loud whether he had completely lost the plot or become part of it. On February 11, I heard a news item about the UN leader congratulating Iran on the occasion of the 47th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution. I wasn’t sure if I was hallucinating or if Guterres was delusional.

UN's Guterres celebrates oppression

I looked through the UN secretary-general’s social media posts and couldn’t find the celebratory greetings, but before breathing a sigh of relief I turned to official Iranian media. They had obviously received the message loud and clear.

Tehran-based WANA (West Asia News Agency), for example, shared: “The Secretary-General of the United Nations has sent an official message congratulating the President and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the anniversary of the victory of the Islamic Revolution, underscoring the importance of dialogue and international cooperation in addressing global challenges.

“According to official sources, Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, in a letter addressed to Masoud Pezeshkian, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, extended his warmest congratulations on the occasion of Iran’s National Day....”

The head of the body ostensibly dedicated to world peace, democracy and human rights, was congratulating a jihadist regime that encourages global war and terrorism, calls for Israel’s destruction, oppresses ethnic and religious minorities, is fundamentally misogynous, and sentences members of the LGBTQ community to death.

The blood of thousands of brave protesters who were slaughtered after taking to the streets calling for a regime change had barely dried when Guterres sent his message to their murderers. Guterres’s kick in the gut came amid continued reports that wounded demonstrators are being killed by regime forces in their hospital beds.

Incidentally, Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, noted that, “this week, the Islamic Regime in Iran will take a seat on the United Nations Human Rights Council’s advisory committee.” Absurdity and hypocrisy have become part of the UN’s DNA.

If the deaths of the Iranian demonstrators didn’t cause him to think again, there was little hope that the UN secretary-general would consider Iran’s crimes against Israel (and the rest of the world) before applauding the ayatollahs’ anniversary.

The Iranian regime has been the major backer of terrorist proxies Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, among others. In last June’s 12-day Rising Lion War alone, Tehran launched some 550 ballistic missiles and 1,000 drones on Israel – every one a war crime. Among the places hit were Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba and the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, where ground-breaking research labs were destroyed – an incalculable loss for human healthcare.

This week in Gaza, where Guterres pretends love and peace will prevail, Israel’s long-standing claims that Hamas has been operating out of hospitals received an unexpected validation. The NGO Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) announced that it had suspended all non-critical operations at Nasser Hospital after staff reported armed men were moving weapons there and interrogating patients (a tactic they might have learned from their Iranian sponsors).

Not that the medical organization is a fan of Israel. The Jerusalem Post’s Mathilda Heller reported on Israeli ministry documents alleging that MSF had “practiced advancing an extreme anti-Israeli narrative under the guise of humanitarian activity.”

More guts than Guterres

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot showed more guts than Guterres last week. France is calling for the dismissal of Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the Palestinian territories, after her comments at the 17th Al Jazeera Forum in Doha earlier this month. She clearly felt enough at ease there to declare in a rant against Israel: “We who do not control large amounts of financial capital, algorithms, and weapons – we now see that we as humanity have a common enemy.”

Germany, Austria, and the Czech Republic backed France in calling for Albanese to be fired for the latest in a string of anti-Israel and antisemitic comments.

Even Guterres’s spokesperson Stephane Dujarric, when asked in a press briefing, distanced the UN secretary-general from Albanese’s statements, saying that his office “doesn’t agree with much of what she says, and wouldn’t use the language that she uses to describe the situation in the region.”

Nonetheless, Guterres did not act against Albanese. Similarly, Dujarric attributed his boss’s greetings to the Iranian regime as standard protocol on national days.

As David Ben-Basat wrote in Maariv last weekend, “This is the moment of truth. The UN continues to exist solely by inertia, surviving on diplomatic habit, not trust. As the gap between its pretensions and reality widens, so does the sense that the organization is a body that speaks for humanity without representing it. The world is changing rapidly, and the UN remains stuck in the power patterns of the last century.”

Guterres is head of an increasingly detached world body. All that remains is for it to go through the motions – particularly those aimed against Israel.