Election results show haredi public voted overwhelmingly for their parties

Expectations were high that significant numbers of haredi voters would vote for non-sectoral parties.

April 15, 2019 19:53
3 minute read.
Haredi men gather in Jerusalem for the funeral of Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach

Haredi men gather in Jerusalem for the funeral of Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach . (photo credit: EHUD AMITON/TPS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Despite the expectations of some analysts and observers, haredi voters voted overwhelmingly for the two haredi parties Shas and United Torah Judaism in last Tuesday’s election.

The growing community of so-called “modern haredim” who have adopted different aspects of modernity has been expected to change the voting patterns of the haredi community to a certain extent and vote for non-haredi parties.

But the figures from the latest election demonstrate that there is essentially no growth in the number of haredi voters voting for parties other than Shas and UTJ.

The achievement of these two parties in ensuring that the vast majority of haredi voters keep voting for the haredi parties was the critical factor in ensuring the impressive gains UTJ and Shas made in the recent election.

Shas, which languished in the polls on five and six seats actually managed to increase its representation from seven to eight Knesset seats, while UTJ has at least seven and perhaps eight seats, with the final results expected this Thursday.

According to Dr. Gilad Malach, director of the Israel Democracy Institute's Ultra-Orthodox in Israel Program, approximately 90 percent of haredi voters voted for the two haredi parties and just 10 percent for non-haredi parties such as Likud and the United Right Party.

In the last election in 2015 the numbers were confused somewhat by the Yahad party headed by Eli Yishai, a haredi party, which ran on a joint slate with Otzma Yehudit, a far-right national-religious party and received not insignificant support among the haredi community.

But in 2013, Malach says approximately 11 percent of haredi voters voted for non-haredi parties meaning that the there is no growth whatsoever, and even a possible minor decrease in the number of haredi voters voting for non-haredi parties.

Malach also notes that of the roughly 10% of haredi voters choosing non-haredi parties, approximately half likely come from the Chabad community where large numbers of voters vote for the hard right and far right parties, who in this election combined on the United Right list.

In terms of overall voting numbers, the number of UTJ voters rose in the 2019 election by some 39,000 votes, or 18.5%, over the 2015 vote.

This is roughly in line with the rate of population growth in the haredi community of 4.2% per year and represents a major achievement for UTJ in persuading the overwhelming majority of its voter base to keep voting for it.

Shas’s share of the vote actually increased by less than UTJ’s, rising by some 17,000 votes, an increase of just 7%. 

Malach noted that although Shas vote share in the haredi stronghold cities of Bnei Brak, Elad, Modiin Illit, Beitar Illit and Jerusalem increased, its voters in the geographic periphery remained static accounting for its less impressive overall voter share increase.

In general however, Malach said that the expectation that so-called modern haredim would change haredi voting patterns has not transpired.

During the last decade, significant numbers of people from the haredi community have served in the IDF, obtained higher education qualifications, joined the workforce and adopted Internet usage, or a combination of those factors.

It was thought that this societal change might bring political change to the community, and mainstream parties such as Likud, Labor and Blue and White added haredi candidates to their electoral slates.

But this political change is not yet evident.

“People can identify as modern, adopt modern behaviours, such as higher education and entering the work force, but vote for haredi parties and show that they feel still part of the community and want to vote for the sake of the community,” said Malach.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

The basic error is to treat all the settlements alike
April 22, 2019
10 things to know about how the settlers voted