Israel High Court: Women can be Rabbinical Court administrator

Will we soon see a woman in the highest administrative position in the Rabbinical Courts system?

August 17, 2017 06:48
2 minute read.
Israel High Court: Women can be Rabbinical Court administrator



Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Women can be chosen for the highest administrative position in the Rabbinical Courts system, the High Court of Justice ruled on Wednesday in a historic decision following seven years of legal battles.

The 2014 petition that led to the decision was filed by Mavoi Satum, or “Dead End,” director and lawyer Batya Kahana-Dror, whose candidacy for the position of Rabbinical Courts chief administrator had been ignored due to her being female.

A three-justice panel of Elyakim Rubinstein, recently retired, Uri Shoham and Menahem Mazuz said that a combination of the Rabbinical Courts, the Religious Services Ministry and the State Attorney’s Office had failed to create updated eligibility criteria that did not discriminate against women.

“The absence of equal representation in the Rabbinical Courts has stood out for a long time,” wrote the court.

This failure despite being given extensive time, the justices noted, had forced them to declare a set of eligibility criteria and to cancel criteria which could lead to discrimination.

Although Rubinstein reached the mandatory retirement age for judges of 70 in June, he can still hear cases that he started on before then.

Under to the new criteria, a religious female lawyer or a woman who is a recognized Rabbinical Court’s litigator – a position that has been open to women for years – can submit her candidacy for the top position after practicing in the courts for seven years.

The old criteria provided a variety of vague reasons that the Rabbinical Courts had used to block women’s candidacy.

Mavoi Satum said the decision “constitutes a historic jump forward in the area of religion and state, and an important achievement in the struggle for the rights of women in the Rabbinical Court system.”

Kahana-Dror added, “I am happy that I had the honor to head this important proceeding to improve the status of women in Israel,” adding that it also would “strengthen the values of Judaism and democracy” that underlie the state.

A variety of other Knesset members and women’s groups, including New Family director Irit Rosenblum, also praised the decision.

Still, even after the High Court ruling there is no guarantee that the Rabbinical Courts will select a woman for the top administrative position.

The High Court only ordered the Rabbinical Courts that it must fully and equally consider women’s candidacy, not that there must be affirmative action toward selecting a woman.

Some women’s activists are still concerned that the Rabbinical Courts will find clever unofficial reasons, such as objecting to the ideology of female candidates, for blocking women’s candidacies or for not selecting them.

Furthermore, the decision does not allow women to become Rabbinical Court judges. The chief administrator is a bureaucratic position for managing human resources, budget and operations issues, not for deciding Jewish law.

Petitions dating back to 2010 had been rejected by the High Court as premature. But after seven years of related changes, including former attorney-general Yehuda Weinstein pushing for advancing women’s rights on the issue, the High Court came to a different conclusion.

In the interim, the 2014 petition had also already led to the appointment of Michal Goldstein as the first woman to be deputy chief administrator of the Rabbinical Courts.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Swimming race [Illustrative]
July 19, 2019
Med student Andi Murez ready to jump into pool for Israel at Worlds


Cookie Settings