RSS | Advertise With Us | Blogs | Judaica Gifts |  4 Kislev 5770, Saturday, November 21, 2009 22:01 IST |
WebJPost.com 
Subscribe! Judaica Gifts
RSS Feeds E-mail Edition
HomeHeadlinesIranian ThreatJewish WorldOpinionBusinessReal EstateLocal IsraelBlogsArts & Culture Français Classifieds
IsraelMiddle EastInternationalHealth & Sci-TechFeaturesTravelCafe OlehMagazineSportsIsrael GuideSubscribe
Specials
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers a 20% discount on online reservations
Israeli Basketball
Watch Live Israeli Premier Basketball Games
Jerusalem Post Lite
Light Edition of the Jerusalem Post for English improvement
Desert lodging & activity
Tents, camping & cabins, various activities and meals in the Negev
The Best Jewish Charity
Learn how Efrat saved 30,000 lives of Jewish children
Tamir Rent a car
Car rental in Israel, special prices
ג'רוזלם פוסט לייט
עיתון חדשות באנגלית קלה התורם לשיפור השפה האנגלית
Tour guides in Israel
Choose you’re your tour guide in Israel
Israel guide
Your guide to Israel
Green Israel
Protecting Israel's environment
ג'רוזלם פוסט לייט
עיתון חדשות באנגלית קלה התורם לשיפור השפה האנגלית


Middle East & Israel Breaking News » Opinion » Op-Ed Contributors » Article

Matrilineality is still best for Jewish identity


PrintSubscribe
Toolbar
+ Recommend:
facebook twitter del.icio.us reddit fark
What's this?

Decrease text size Decrease text size
Increase text size Increase text size

In recent polling, about half of the Israeli population (but not the Orthodox) advocated allowing Jewish identity to follow either parent. This contrasts with the traditional definition whereby Jewish descent depends on the mother.

In early biblical times the criterion was beit av, "the father's house" (Exodus 1:1, Numbers 3:2), but this was superseded by the matrilineal principle, derived from a midrash halacha on Deuteronomy 7:3-4 which refers to "your son" as the child of an Israelite mother - a rule accepted by all halachic authorities (Kiddushin 65b/68b, Yad Issurei Bi'ah 15:4, Shulhan Aruch E.H. 8:5). The change was not unexpected, since the Bible already spoke of not only a father's but a mother's house: In Exodus 1:21, God rewards women's piety by "making them houses," and Ruth 4:11 states that Rachel and Leah "built the house of Israel."

It could be that there was an early stage of fluidity, but when the exiles returned from Babylon they saw the influence of "foreign wives" and encouraged Ezra (10:2-4, 9:11) to make rulings against outmarriage and the easy acceptance of "the daughters of strange gods." Ezra claimed to be following prophetic teaching, though the sages did not list the negative status of gentile wives among Ezra's or the prophets' enactments.

George Foot Moore in his Judaism in the First Centuries of the Christian Era (1927, vol. 1, page 20) finds a parallel in Greek history at the same time as Ezra, when Pericles restricted Athenian citizenship to the child of an Athenian man and an Athenian woman. We do not know whether Ezra saw this as a precedent, but he must have been aware of it.

Solomon Zeitlin (Jewish Quarterly Review 51:2, 1960, pages 135-140) thinks the ruling is a response to the provocative action of Sanballat in marrying his daughter to a son of the Jewish high priest. According to Zeitlin, Judaism had to block the child of a non-Jewess from being a Jew or a priest.

Matrilineality took time to become entrenched, but by the time of the Mishna (Kiddushin 3:12) it was accepted that a child follows its mother's status, and the sages interpreted Jacob's blessing, "The Lord make you as Ephraim and Manasseh" (Genesis 49:20) to aver that the boys' mother was not a gentile but the daughter of Dinah, sister of Joseph.

In the Roman period there were so many conversions and semi-conversions to Judaism that there needed to be a clear definition of Jewish status; otherwise, according to Lawrence Schiffman (Who Was a Jew?, 1985, ch. 2), Judaism would have been swamped by the children of gentile Christian mothers.

Rabbinic Judaism is unyielding in maintaining matrilineality. Lord Jakobovits (The Timely and the Timeless, 1977, pages 198-217) says the certainty of maternity must be set against the possible doubt of paternity. Even in nature the mother's bond with the child is firmer than the father's. And the mother has the superior influence on the child's religious development.

So matrilineality is here to stay.

The writer is emeritus rabbi of the Great Synagogue in Sydney, Australia.

RATE THIS ARTICLE
PrintSubscribe
Toolbar
+ Recommend:
facebook twitter del.icio.us reddit fark
What's this?
Post comment | Terms | Report Abuse
Most Original
eTeacher
Nefesh B'eNefesh
Kadish
JPost.com
KKL Picture of the week
Got a Question?
Have a question about something in this story? Ask it here and get answers from other users like you.

 
 
 
© 1995 - 2009 The Jerusalem Post. All rights reserved.    About Us | Media Kit | Exclusive Content | Advertise with Us | Subscribe | Contact Us | RSS
The online edition of The Jerusalem Post – JPost.com – provides first class news and analysis about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Whether news about Iran, Gaza, Syria, Fatah, Hamas or Hezbollah, JPost.com covers the burning issues of the Middle East and the Israeli-Arab conflict.