Friedman applauds Obama's approach on Iranian nuclear issue

March 7, 2012 10:47
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman applauded US President Barack Obama's dealing with the Iranian nuclear arms issue on Tuesday, commending the US president in an opinion piece in the Times for redefining the nuclear threat in a global context rather than politicizing it as an issue of support for Israel.

According to Friedman, who quoted the US president from an interview he gave to the The Atlantic and from comments during his address to the Israel lobby group AIPAC, Obama has explained that were Tehran to develop a nuclear bomb, the regional repercussions would be immense. He quoted the president as saying the fallout from a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to a Middle Eastern nuclear arms race, and push tensions in a region already fraught with animosity between states. Obama also rightly warned, Friedman wrote, that the risk of a nuclear weapon falling into the hands of a terrorist organization would be profound were Iran to develop a nuclear bomb.

Friedman criticized advocates of a military strike on Iran by Israel, saying consequences of both the US war on Iraq and Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon serve as reminders of what "unintended and unanticipated consequences" may arise from an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Still, Friedman said he was not advocating "paralysis." Rather, he wrote in support of Obama's "call to give diplomacy and biting sanctions a chance to work, while keeping the threat of force on the table."

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Breaking news
March 26, 2019
Red alert sounded in Hof Ashkelon Region